Cost of Revenue Comparison: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Catalent, Inc.

Biotech Giants' Cost of Revenue: A Decade in Review

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014122910000014400000
Thursday, January 1, 2015121550000033800000
Friday, January 1, 2016126050000035900000
Sunday, January 1, 201714208000001254000
Monday, January 1, 201817108000004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 201917129000007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020211100000010100000
Friday, January 1, 2021264600000014300000
Saturday, January 1, 2022318800000023200000
Sunday, January 1, 2023321600000039700000
Monday, January 1, 2024342800000034000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotech Giants

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding cost structures is crucial. Over the past decade, Catalent, Inc. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have showcased contrasting financial trajectories. Catalent's cost of revenue has surged by approximately 179% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion and scaling efforts. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences has maintained a more modest growth, with its cost of revenue increasing by around 176% over the same period. This disparity highlights Catalent's larger operational scale, as its costs consistently dwarf those of Neurocrine by a factor of over 100. The data from 2024 remains incomplete, offering a glimpse into the uncertainties that lie ahead. As these companies navigate the evolving biotech landscape, their financial strategies will be pivotal in shaping their future success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025