Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Mesoblast Limited

Biotech Cost Trends: Mesoblast vs. Neurocrine

__timestampMesoblast LimitedNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142543400014400000
Thursday, January 1, 20152378300033800000
Friday, January 1, 20162976300035900000
Sunday, January 1, 2017120650001254000
Monday, January 1, 201855080004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019751730007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20208149700010100000
Friday, January 1, 20218573100014300000
Saturday, January 1, 20226357200023200000
Sunday, January 1, 20235492200039700000
Monday, January 1, 20244107000034000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Cost of Revenue Trends: Neurocrine Biosciences vs. Mesoblast Limited

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, understanding cost structures is crucial. Over the past decade, Mesoblast Limited and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their cost of revenue. Mesoblast's cost of revenue peaked in 2021, reaching approximately 86 million, a staggering 240% increase from 2014. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences experienced a more modest growth, with costs rising by about 175% over the same period, peaking in 2023.

Interestingly, Mesoblast's costs have shown a downward trend since 2021, while Neurocrine's costs have steadily increased, indicating differing strategic approaches. The data for 2024 is incomplete, highlighting the dynamic nature of financial forecasting. These insights provide a window into the operational efficiencies and market strategies of these biotech giants, offering valuable lessons for investors and industry analysts alike.

Key Takeaway

Understanding cost trends is essential for strategic planning in biotech.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025