Cost of Revenue Comparison: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Insmed Incorporated

Biotech Cost Dynamics: Neurocrine vs. Insmed

__timestampInsmed IncorporatedNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143353499914400000
Thursday, January 1, 2015198200033800000
Friday, January 1, 2016243800035900000
Sunday, January 1, 201729010001254000
Monday, January 1, 201824230004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019242120007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203987200010100000
Friday, January 1, 20214415200014300000
Saturday, January 1, 20225512600023200000
Sunday, January 1, 20236557300039700000
Monday, January 1, 202434000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, understanding cost structures is crucial. This analysis compares the cost of revenue for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Insmed Incorporated from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Insmed's cost of revenue surged by approximately 95%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences saw a more modest increase of around 176% over the same period.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2015: Insmed's costs plummeted by 94%, while Neurocrine's costs more than doubled.
  • 2019-2020: Insmed's costs nearly doubled, reflecting strategic investments or increased production.
  • 2023: Both companies reached their highest costs, with Insmed leading by a 65% margin over Neurocrine.

This data highlights the dynamic nature of cost management in biotech, where strategic decisions can significantly impact financial outcomes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025