Eli Lilly and Company or Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Eli Lilly vs. Rhythm: SG&A Cost Management Battle

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466208000001213000
Thursday, January 1, 201565330000003425000
Friday, January 1, 201664520000006311000
Sunday, January 1, 201765881000009518000
Monday, January 1, 2018597510000028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019621380000036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020612120000046125000
Friday, January 1, 2021643160000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 2022644040000092032000
Sunday, January 1, 20236941200000117532000
Monday, January 1, 20248593800000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Cost Management: Eli Lilly vs. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Eli Lilly and Company, a stalwart in the industry, has consistently maintained high SG&A costs, averaging around $6.4 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a newer player, has seen its SG&A expenses grow from a modest $1.2 million in 2014 to $117 million in 2023, reflecting its rapid expansion.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Eli Lilly's SG&A expenses have shown a steady trend, with a slight increase of about 5% over the decade. Meanwhile, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals has experienced a staggering growth of over 9,500% in the same period. This contrast highlights the different stages of growth and strategic focus between an established giant and an emerging innovator in the pharmaceutical sector.

Conclusion

Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how these companies allocate resources to support their operations and growth strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025