Johnson & Johnson vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency: J&J vs. CRISPR Therapeutics Over a Decade

__timestampCRISPR Therapeutics AGJohnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 2014151300022746000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151257300021536000000
Friday, January 1, 20164223800021685000000
Sunday, January 1, 20176980000025354000000
Monday, January 1, 201811377300027091000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201917936200027556000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202026940700028427000000
Friday, January 1, 20211795300023402000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211025000024596000000
Sunday, January 1, 202313025000026553000000
Monday, January 1, 2024-231400027471000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Exploring Cost Efficiency: Johnson & Johnson vs. CRISPR Therapeutics AG

In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, understanding cost efficiency is crucial. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for two industry giants: Johnson & Johnson and CRISPR Therapeutics AG, from 2014 to 2023.

A Decade of Financial Insights

Over the past decade, Johnson & Johnson has consistently demonstrated robust financial management, with its cost of revenue averaging around $25 billion annually. In contrast, CRISPR Therapeutics AG, a pioneer in gene-editing technology, has shown a more dynamic growth pattern, with costs increasing from a modest $1.5 million in 2014 to over $130 million in 2023.

Efficiency in Focus

While Johnson & Johnson's cost of revenue has remained relatively stable, CRISPR's costs have surged by over 8,500% in the same period. This stark contrast highlights the differing operational scales and strategic investments of these companies, offering valuable insights into their financial strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025