__timestamp | II-VI Incorporated | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 137707000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 143539000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 160646000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 176002000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 208565000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 233518000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 440998000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 483989000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 474096000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1036699000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 854001000 | 32065000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the spending patterns of industry leaders can offer valuable insights. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and II-VI Incorporated have demonstrated contrasting approaches to Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have consistently grown, peaking at approximately $30 billion in 2023, reflecting a strategic investment in operational efficiency and market expansion. In contrast, II-VI Incorporated, a key player in the materials and components sector, has shown a more volatile pattern, with a significant surge in 2023, reaching over $1 billion. This represents a nearly 650% increase from 2014, highlighting a period of aggressive growth and restructuring. The data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. These spending patterns underscore the diverse strategies employed by companies to navigate competitive markets.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Microsoft Corporation or II-VI Incorporated?
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs II-VI Incorporated
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Microsoft Corporation vs II-VI Incorporated
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Microsoft Corporation vs II-VI Incorporated
Microsoft Corporation or Microchip Technology Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Microsoft Corporation vs ANSYS, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Corpay, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or CDW Corporation
Microsoft Corporation or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Microsoft Corporation vs GoDaddy Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
EBITDA Metrics Evaluated: Microsoft Corporation vs II-VI Incorporated