__timestamp | Microchip Technology Incorporated | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 267278000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 274815000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 301670000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 499811000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 452100000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 682900000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 676600000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 610300000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 718900000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 797700000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 734200000 | 32065000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft Corporation and Microchip Technology Incorporated have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. Microsoft, a tech giant, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive operations and market reach. In contrast, Microchip Technology, a key player in the semiconductor industry, has managed a more modest increase of around 175% in the same period, indicating a more controlled approach to scaling its operations.
While Microsoft's expenses are significantly higher, this is proportional to its vast revenue streams and global presence. Microchip's leaner expense management could be seen as a strategic advantage in maintaining competitive pricing and innovation. As the tech landscape continues to shift, these companies' approaches to SG&A costs will be pivotal in shaping their future success.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Microchip Technology Incorporated
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Microsoft Corporation and Microchip Technology Incorporated
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Microsoft Corporation vs Microchip Technology Incorporated
Microsoft Corporation or Microchip Technology Incorporated: Who Invests More in Innovation?
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company
Microsoft Corporation and II-VI Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation vs ANSYS, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Corpay, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or CDW Corporation
Microsoft Corporation or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
EBITDA Performance Review: Microsoft Corporation vs Microchip Technology Incorporated