Microsoft Corporation or Microchip Technology Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Microsoft vs. Microchip: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampMicrochip Technology IncorporatedMicrosoft Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201426727800020488000000
Thursday, January 1, 201527481500020324000000
Friday, January 1, 201630167000019198000000
Sunday, January 1, 201749981100019942000000
Monday, January 1, 201845210000022223000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201968290000023098000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202067660000024709000000
Friday, January 1, 202161030000025224000000
Saturday, January 1, 202271890000027725000000
Sunday, January 1, 202379770000030334000000
Monday, January 1, 202473420000032065000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Microsoft or Microchip Technology?

In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft Corporation and Microchip Technology Incorporated have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. Microsoft, a tech giant, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive operations and market reach. In contrast, Microchip Technology, a key player in the semiconductor industry, has managed a more modest increase of around 175% in the same period, indicating a more controlled approach to scaling its operations.

While Microsoft's expenses are significantly higher, this is proportional to its vast revenue streams and global presence. Microchip's leaner expense management could be seen as a strategic advantage in maintaining competitive pricing and innovation. As the tech landscape continues to shift, these companies' approaches to SG&A costs will be pivotal in shaping their future success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025