__timestamp | ANSYS, Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 246376000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 253603000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 269515000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 338640000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 413580000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 521200000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 587707000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 715377000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 772871000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 855135000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 995340000 | 32065000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry giants is crucial. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and ANSYS, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches to managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft consistently allocated a significant portion of its budget to SG&A, with a notable increase of approximately 48% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, ANSYS, Inc. exhibited a more conservative growth in SG&A expenses, rising by about 247% over the same period. This divergence highlights Microsoft's aggressive market expansion and ANSYS's steady growth strategy. Interestingly, while Microsoft's SG&A expenses continued to rise into 2024, ANSYS's data for that year remains unavailable, leaving room for speculation on its future financial maneuvers. These trends offer valuable insights into the strategic priorities of these tech titans.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs ANSYS, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs ANSYS, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and ANSYS, Inc.: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Microsoft Corporation vs ANSYS, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Microchip Technology Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Microsoft Corporation and II-VI Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Corpay, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or CDW Corporation
Microsoft Corporation or Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Microsoft Corporation vs GoDaddy Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Microsoft Corporation Against ANSYS, Inc.