Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and PTC Therapeutics, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biotech Giants' SG&A Spending: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141798600044820000
Thursday, January 1, 20153248000082080000
Friday, January 1, 20166808100097130000
Sunday, January 1, 2017169906000121271000
Monday, January 1, 2018248932000153548000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019354100000202541000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020433300000245164000
Friday, January 1, 2021583300000285773000
Saturday, January 1, 2022752700000325998000
Sunday, January 1, 2023887600000332540000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Spending Trends: Neurocrine Biosciences vs. PTC Therapeutics

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding spending patterns is crucial. Over the past decade, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and PTC Therapeutics, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Neurocrine Biosciences has seen a staggering increase of nearly 4,800% in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, PTC Therapeutics' SG&A expenses grew by approximately 640% during the same period, indicating a more measured approach.

By 2023, Neurocrine's SG&A expenses were nearly three times higher than PTC's, highlighting its significant investment in administrative and sales capabilities. This divergence in spending patterns may suggest differing strategic priorities, with Neurocrine potentially focusing more on scaling operations rapidly. As these companies continue to evolve, their SG&A spending will remain a key indicator of their strategic directions and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025