Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Biopharma Cost Efficiency: Neurocrine vs. Supernus (2014-2023)

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014144000005758000
Thursday, January 1, 2015338000008423000
Friday, January 1, 20163590000011986000
Sunday, January 1, 2017125400015215000
Monday, January 1, 2018488900015356000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019740000016660000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201010000052459000
Friday, January 1, 20211430000075061000
Saturday, January 1, 20222320000087221000
Sunday, January 1, 20233970000083779000
Monday, January 1, 202434000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

Exploring Cost Efficiency in Biopharmaceuticals: Neurocrine vs. Supernus

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, cost efficiency is a critical metric. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Neurocrine Biosciences started with a cost of revenue of approximately $14 million in 2014, peaking at nearly $40 million by 2023. In contrast, Supernus Pharmaceuticals began with a modest $5.8 million, surging to an impressive $83.8 million in the same period. This represents a staggering 1,345% increase for Supernus, compared to Neurocrine's 184% growth. The data highlights Supernus's aggressive expansion strategy, reflected in its higher cost of revenue. As the industry evolves, understanding these financial dynamics is crucial for stakeholders aiming to navigate the biopharmaceutical sector's complexities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025