SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Ascendis Pharma A/S and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biopharma SG&A: Ascendis vs. BioCryst Efficiency Battle

__timestampAscendis Pharma A/SBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201462740007461000
Thursday, January 1, 2015941500013047000
Friday, January 1, 20161150400011253000
Sunday, January 1, 20171348200013933000
Monday, January 1, 20182505700029514000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194847300037121000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207666900067929000
Friday, January 1, 2021160180000118818000
Saturday, January 1, 2022221227000159371000
Sunday, January 1, 2023264410000213894000
Monday, January 1, 2024284545000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining operational efficiency. Ascendis Pharma A/S and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their SG&A spending from 2014 to 2023. Ascendis Pharma's SG&A expenses surged by over 4,100% during this period, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals saw a more modest increase of approximately 2,800%, indicating a steadier growth approach.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018: Both companies maintained relatively low SG&A expenses, with BioCryst slightly ahead.
  • 2019-2023: Ascendis overtook BioCryst, peaking at 26% higher expenses in 2023.

This analysis highlights the strategic differences in managing operational costs, offering insights into their market positioning and future growth potential.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025