__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Corning Incorporated |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 1211000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 1523000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 1472000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 1467000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 1799000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 1585000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 1747000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 1827000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 1898000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 1843000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 1931000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and materials, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry giants: Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Incorporated, from 2014 to 2023. Over this decade, Corning consistently outspent Applied Materials, with SG&A expenses peaking at approximately 1.9 billion in 2022, a 57% increase from 2014. In contrast, Applied Materials saw a more dramatic rise, with expenses surging by 102% to nearly 1.8 billion in 2023. This trend highlights Corning's steady operational strategy, while Applied Materials demonstrates a more aggressive expansion. Notably, data for Corning in 2024 is missing, suggesting potential shifts in their financial strategy. As these companies continue to innovate, understanding their cost structures provides valuable insights into their competitive positioning and future growth trajectories.
Who Generates More Revenue? Applied Materials, Inc. or Corning Incorporated
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Incorporated
Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Incorporated: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Corning Incorporated
Applied Materials, Inc. or Block, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and NXP Semiconductors N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. or Wipro Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fair Isaac Corporation
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Corning Incorporated