__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | The Trade Desk, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 23975000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 40070000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 78219000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 119825000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 171981000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 275930000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 346359000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 623959000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 863142000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 968248000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 1082333000 |
Cracking the code
In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.
From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.8 billion in 2023. This represents a growth of nearly 100% over the decade, reflecting their expansive operational strategy. In contrast, The Trade Desk, Inc. started with significantly lower SG&A costs, around $24 million in 2014, but experienced a dramatic increase to nearly $968 million by 2023, marking an exponential growth of over 3,900%.
While Applied Materials maintains a consistent growth trajectory, The Trade Desk's rapid increase suggests aggressive scaling and market penetration. However, missing data for 2024 indicates potential volatility or strategic shifts. Understanding these trends can offer valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and market strategies.
Revenue Showdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs The Trade Desk, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc.
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Applied Materials, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and VMware, Inc.
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc. Allocate Funds
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. or Block, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and NXP Semiconductors N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Incorporated
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. Compared to The Trade Desk, Inc.