Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.

SG&A Cost Optimization: Applied Materials vs. The Trade Desk

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.The Trade Desk, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201489000000023975000
Thursday, January 1, 201589700000040070000
Friday, January 1, 201681900000078219000
Sunday, January 1, 2017890000000119825000
Monday, January 1, 20181002000000171981000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019982000000275930000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201093000000346359000
Friday, January 1, 20211229000000623959000
Saturday, January 1, 20221438000000863142000
Sunday, January 1, 20231628000000968248000
Monday, January 1, 202417970000001082333000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and The Trade Desk, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials, Inc. has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.8 billion in 2023. This represents a growth of nearly 100% over the decade, reflecting their expansive operational strategy. In contrast, The Trade Desk, Inc. started with significantly lower SG&A costs, around $24 million in 2014, but experienced a dramatic increase to nearly $968 million by 2023, marking an exponential growth of over 3,900%.

Insights and Implications

While Applied Materials maintains a consistent growth trajectory, The Trade Desk's rapid increase suggests aggressive scaling and market penetration. However, missing data for 2024 indicates potential volatility or strategic shifts. Understanding these trends can offer valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025