| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | TE Connectivity Ltd. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 1882000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 1504000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 1463000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 1591000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 1594000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 1490000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 1392000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 1512000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 1584000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 1670000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 1732000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the competitive landscape of technology and connectivity, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd. have showcased distinct trajectories in managing these costs.
From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials has seen a remarkable 102% increase in SG&A expenses, reflecting strategic investments in growth and innovation. In contrast, TE Connectivity's expenses have grown by about 8%, indicating a more stable approach. Notably, in 2023, Applied Materials' SG&A expenses surged to nearly match TE Connectivity's, highlighting a significant shift in their financial strategy.
This analysis provides a window into how these industry leaders balance operational costs with market demands, offering valuable insights for investors and stakeholders alike.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs TE Connectivity Ltd.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.
Gross Profit Trends Compared: Applied Materials, Inc. vs TE Connectivity Ltd.
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs TE Connectivity Ltd.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. or Block, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and NXP Semiconductors N.V.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Incorporated
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. or Wipro Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fair Isaac Corporation
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs TE Connectivity Ltd.