__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Block, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 206797000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 289084000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 425869000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 503723000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 750396000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 1061082000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 1688873000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 2600515000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 3744800000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 4228199000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and finance, managing operational costs is crucial for sustained growth. Applied Materials, Inc. and Block, Inc. have been at the forefront of this challenge. Over the past decade, Applied Materials has demonstrated a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing from approximately $890 million in 2014 to nearly $1.8 billion in 2024. This represents a growth of about 102% over the period. In contrast, Block, Inc. has seen a more dramatic rise, with SG&A expenses skyrocketing from around $207 million in 2014 to over $4.2 billion by 2023, marking an astonishing increase of over 1,900%.
While Applied Materials shows a consistent and controlled growth in expenses, Block's rapid expansion reflects its aggressive scaling strategy. However, the absence of data for Block in 2024 leaves room for speculation on its future cost management strategies.
Revenue Showdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Block, Inc.
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Block, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Block, Inc.
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and Block, Inc. Allocate Funds
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or The Trade Desk, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and NXP Semiconductors N.V.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and TE Connectivity Ltd.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Corning Incorporated
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. or Wipro Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fair Isaac Corporation