Applied Materials, Inc. or Block, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Comparing SG&A Cost Management: Applied Materials vs. Block

__timestampApplied Materials, Inc.Block, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014890000000206797000
Thursday, January 1, 2015897000000289084000
Friday, January 1, 2016819000000425869000
Sunday, January 1, 2017890000000503723000
Monday, January 1, 20181002000000750396000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199820000001061082000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010930000001688873000
Friday, January 1, 202112290000002600515000
Saturday, January 1, 202214380000003744800000
Sunday, January 1, 202316280000004228199000
Monday, January 1, 20241797000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Applied Materials or Block?

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and finance, managing operational costs is crucial for sustained growth. Applied Materials, Inc. and Block, Inc. have been at the forefront of this challenge. Over the past decade, Applied Materials has demonstrated a steady increase in SG&A expenses, growing from approximately $890 million in 2014 to nearly $1.8 billion in 2024. This represents a growth of about 102% over the period. In contrast, Block, Inc. has seen a more dramatic rise, with SG&A expenses skyrocketing from around $207 million in 2014 to over $4.2 billion by 2023, marking an astonishing increase of over 1,900%.

While Applied Materials shows a consistent and controlled growth in expenses, Block's rapid expansion reflects its aggressive scaling strategy. However, the absence of data for Block in 2024 leaves room for speculation on its future cost management strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025