__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | VeriSign, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 189488000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 196914000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 198253000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 211705000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 197559000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 184262000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 186003000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 188311000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 195400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 204200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 211100000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving tech industry, operational efficiency is key to maintaining a competitive edge. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent tech companies, Applied Materials, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.
Over this period, Applied Materials, Inc. has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, growing by approximately 102% from 2014 to 2023. This upward trend reflects the company's strategic investments in scaling operations and expanding market reach. In contrast, VeriSign, Inc.'s SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of around 8% over the same period, indicating a focus on maintaining operational efficiency.
Interestingly, the data for 2024 shows a gap for VeriSign, Inc., suggesting potential shifts in reporting or operational strategies. This analysis provides a window into how these tech giants manage their operational costs in a dynamic market.
Applied Materials, Inc. or VeriSign, Inc.: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Gross Profit Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. Trends
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Applied Materials, Inc. vs VeriSign, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Leidos Holdings, Inc. Trends and Insights