| __timestamp | ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. | Applied Materials, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 13673000000 | 890000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14295000000 | 897000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 15099000000 | 819000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15767000000 | 890000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19552000000 | 1002000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 22389000000 | 982000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 23806000000 | 1093000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 27191000000 | 1229000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 30384000000 | 1438000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 25930017000 | 1628000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 27353513000 | 1797000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving semiconductor industry, understanding the financial dynamics of key players is crucial. This chart compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry titans: Applied Materials, Inc. and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd., from 2014 to 2023.
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. has consistently outpaced Applied Materials in SG&A expenses, with a peak in 2022, reaching approximately 30% higher than its 2014 levels. In contrast, Applied Materials has shown a steady increase, with a notable 80% rise over the same period. This divergence highlights differing strategic priorities and operational scales.
Interestingly, 2023 saw a dip in ASE's expenses, while Applied Materials continued its upward trajectory. This could indicate a shift in market strategies or operational efficiencies. Missing data for ASE in 2024 suggests a need for cautious interpretation of future trends.
Applied Materials, Inc. and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: A Comprehensive Revenue Analysis
Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Gross Profit Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. Trends
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Research and Development Expenses Breakdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. and ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Leidos Holdings, Inc. Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Trimble Inc. Trends and Insights