| __timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Zebra Technologies Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 351518000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 763025000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 751000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 749000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 811000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 826000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 787000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 935000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 982000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 915000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 981000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding a company's operational efficiency is crucial. Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses offer a window into this efficiency. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation have showcased distinct trends in their SG&A expenditures.
From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $1.8 billion in 2023. This represents a growth of nearly 100% over the period, reflecting the company's expanding operations and strategic investments.
Zebra Technologies, on the other hand, displayed a more conservative growth pattern, with SG&A expenses rising from $351 million in 2014 to $982 million in 2022. Notably, data for 2024 is missing, indicating potential shifts in reporting or strategy.
These trends highlight the contrasting approaches of two industry leaders in managing operational costs.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Gross Profit Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation Trends
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Ubiquiti Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation Allocate Funds
Applied Materials, Inc. or Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Applied Materials, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation