__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Western Digital Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 761000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 773000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 997000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 1445000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 1473000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 1317000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 1153000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 1105000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 1117000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 970000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 828000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. This chart provides a fascinating glimpse into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two tech titans: Applied Materials, Inc. and Western Digital Corporation, from 2014 to 2024.
Over the past decade, Applied Materials has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2024 with a 100% rise from 2014. This growth reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in innovation. In contrast, Western Digital's expenses peaked in 2018, with a notable 93% increase from 2014, before experiencing a gradual decline, indicating a strategic shift towards cost optimization.
This comparison highlights the diverse approaches these companies take in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights into their business models and market strategies.
Applied Materials, Inc. or Western Digital Corporation: Who Leads in Yearly Revenue?
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Applied Materials, Inc. or Western Digital Corporation
Research and Development Investment: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Western Digital Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. or Seagate Technology Holdings plc: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Applied Materials, Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Pure Storage, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.