Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Spending: A Decade of Strategic Insights

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014432600049315000
Thursday, January 1, 201522620600075043000
Friday, January 1, 20169439100083749000
Sunday, January 1, 201753821000122682000
Monday, January 1, 201835463000207761000
Tuesday, January 1, 201946456000284812000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071318000317875000
Friday, January 1, 2021135256000282660000
Saturday, January 1, 2022102708000451421000
Sunday, January 1, 2023129620000481871000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, operational efficiency is key. This analysis of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses from 2014 to 2023 reveals intriguing insights into the financial strategies of Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. Over the past decade, Sarepta has consistently outpaced ImmunityBio in SG&A spending, peaking at nearly 482% higher in 2023. This trend suggests a robust investment in operational infrastructure and market expansion. Meanwhile, ImmunityBio's expenses have shown a more volatile pattern, with a significant spike in 2015, indicating strategic shifts or one-time investments. Understanding these financial dynamics provides a window into each company's growth strategy and market positioning. As the biotech landscape evolves, monitoring these expenses can offer valuable foresight into future industry leaders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025