__timestamp | Snap-on Incorporated | Thomson Reuters Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1047900000 | 9209000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1009100000 | 8810000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1001400000 | 8232000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1101300000 | 8079000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1080700000 | 4131000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1071500000 | 4413000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1054800000 | 3999000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1202300000 | 1624000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1181200000 | 1622000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1249000000 | 64000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 0 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of operational efficiency. This analysis compares the SG&A expenses of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated from 2014 to 2023.
Thomson Reuters, a global leader in information services, saw a dramatic decline in SG&A expenses, plummeting from a high of $9.2 billion in 2014 to a mere $64 million in 2023. This represents a staggering 99% reduction, reflecting strategic cost-cutting measures and possibly divestitures.
Conversely, Snap-on Incorporated, a manufacturer of high-end tools, maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense profile. Starting at approximately $1 billion in 2014, it saw a modest increase to $1.25 billion by 2023, indicating consistent operational strategies.
This comparison highlights the contrasting financial strategies of two industry giants over a decade.
Comparing Revenue Performance: Thomson Reuters Corporation or Snap-on Incorporated?
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Thomson Reuters Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Thomson Reuters Corporation and EMCOR Group, Inc.
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Thomson Reuters Corporation or Snap-on Incorporated
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Thomson Reuters Corporation and Builders FirstSource, Inc.
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Watsco, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Thomson Reuters Corporation or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Masco Corporation
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Snap-on Incorporated
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Thomson Reuters Corporation and TransUnion
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Thomson Reuters Corporation or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Thomson Reuters Corporation and Carlisle Companies Incorporated