Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated

SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters vs. Snap-on

__timestampSnap-on IncorporatedThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201410479000009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201510091000008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201610014000008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201711013000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201810807000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201910715000004413000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010548000003999000000
Friday, January 1, 202112023000001624000000
Saturday, January 1, 202211812000001622000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023124900000064000000
Monday, January 1, 20240
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Expenses: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of corporate finance, Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses are a critical measure of operational efficiency. This analysis compares the SG&A expenses of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated from 2014 to 2023.

Thomson Reuters Corporation

Thomson Reuters, a global leader in information services, saw a dramatic decline in SG&A expenses, plummeting from a high of $9.2 billion in 2014 to a mere $64 million in 2023. This represents a staggering 99% reduction, reflecting strategic cost-cutting measures and possibly divestitures.

Snap-on Incorporated

Conversely, Snap-on Incorporated, a manufacturer of high-end tools, maintained a relatively stable SG&A expense profile. Starting at approximately $1 billion in 2014, it saw a modest increase to $1.25 billion by 2023, indicating consistent operational strategies.

This comparison highlights the contrasting financial strategies of two industry giants over a decade.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025