| __timestamp | Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation | Thomson Reuters Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2229642000 | 9209000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2159439000 | 8810000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2319592000 | 8232000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 2568511000 | 8079000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2719909000 | 4131000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2932602000 | 4413000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 3334378000 | 3999000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 3362722000 | 1624000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 3633150000 | 1622000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 4341769000 | 64000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1281443000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the competitive landscape of corporate finance, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. This analysis compares the SG&A cost optimization strategies of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation from 2014 to 2023.
Over the past decade, Booz Allen Hamilton has shown a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 4.3 billion in 2023, a 95% increase from 2014. In contrast, Thomson Reuters experienced a dramatic reduction, with expenses plummeting from 9.2 billion in 2014 to a mere 64 million in 2023, marking a 99% decrease. This stark contrast highlights Thomson Reuters' aggressive cost-cutting measures.
While Booz Allen Hamilton's data for 2024 shows a significant drop, Thomson Reuters' data is missing, leaving room for speculation on future strategies. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic financial management in maintaining competitive advantage.
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost Insights: Breaking Down Thomson Reuters Corporation and Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation's Expenses
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Thomson Reuters Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated
Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Watsco, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Thomson Reuters Corporation or Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
Thomson Reuters Corporation or Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Masco Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Thomson Reuters Corporation and TransUnion
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Thomson Reuters Corporation and Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Thomson Reuters Corporation or J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Thomson Reuters Corporation or Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Thomson Reuters Corporation Compared to Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation