Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biotech Giants: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610001860000
Thursday, January 1, 2015130470002963000
Friday, January 1, 2016112530006961000
Sunday, January 1, 20171393300011779000
Monday, January 1, 20182951400013697000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193712100015749000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206792900018638000
Friday, January 1, 202111881800027196000
Saturday, January 1, 202215937100031739000
Sunday, January 1, 202321389400033491000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Protagonist Therapeutics or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals?

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and profitability. Over the past decade, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals has seen a staggering 2,768% increase in SG&A costs, peaking at $213.9 million in 2023. In contrast, Protagonist Therapeutics has maintained a more conservative growth, with SG&A expenses rising by 1,700% to $33.5 million in the same period.

BioCryst's aggressive spending strategy may reflect its ambitious expansion plans, while Protagonist's more measured approach suggests a focus on cost efficiency. As investors and stakeholders evaluate these companies, understanding their financial strategies provides valuable insights into their operational priorities and future trajectories. The data highlights the importance of strategic financial management in the biotech sector, where balancing innovation with fiscal responsibility is key to long-term success.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025