Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: HUTCHMED vs. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

__timestampHUTCHMED (China) LimitedRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014266840001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015298290003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016395780006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017432770009518000
Monday, January 1, 20184864500028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195293400036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206134900046125000
Friday, January 1, 202112712500068486000
Saturday, January 1, 202213610600092032000
Sunday, January 1, 2023133175999117532000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Spending Trends: A Tale of Two Companies

In the dynamic world of pharmaceuticals, understanding spending patterns is crucial. Over the past decade, HUTCHMED (China) Limited and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

HUTCHMED's Steady Climb

HUTCHMED's SG&A expenses have seen a consistent upward trend, growing by approximately 400% from 2014 to 2023. This steady increase reflects the company's expanding operations and strategic investments in administrative capabilities.

Rhythm's Rapid Rise

In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals experienced a dramatic surge, with SG&A expenses skyrocketing by nearly 9,600% over the same period. This sharp rise, particularly noticeable from 2018 onwards, underscores the company's aggressive market expansion and increased operational activities.

These patterns highlight the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in managing their administrative costs, offering valuable insights into their growth and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025