Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Wave Life Sciences Ltd.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biotech SG&A Spending: Rhythm vs. Wave

__timestampRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Wave Life Sciences Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 201412130002999000
Thursday, January 1, 2015342500010393000
Friday, January 1, 2016631100015994000
Sunday, January 1, 2017951800026975000
Monday, January 1, 20182808000039509000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193655000048869000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204612500042510000
Friday, January 1, 20216848600046105000
Saturday, January 1, 20229203200050513000
Sunday, January 1, 202311753200051292000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, strategic spending on Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses can be a key differentiator. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Wave Life Sciences Ltd. have shown distinct patterns in their SG&A expenditures over the past decade.

A Decade of Growth

From 2014 to 2023, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals saw a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly 97 times from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Wave Life Sciences experienced a more modest growth, with expenses increasing by about 17 times over the same period.

Strategic Implications

This divergence in spending could reflect differing strategic priorities or stages of growth. Rhythm's aggressive increase might indicate a focus on rapid expansion and market penetration, while Wave's steadier growth could suggest a more conservative approach. Understanding these patterns provides valuable insights into each company's operational strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025