Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Expenses: CymaBay vs Rhythm (2014-2023)

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201481850001213000
Thursday, January 1, 201588710003425000
Friday, January 1, 201696450006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017123870009518000
Monday, January 1, 20181438100028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201742500046125000
Friday, January 1, 20212304000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 20222511600092032000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000117532000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Tale of Two Biotechs: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational costs is crucial for success. This chart compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals has consistently outpaced CymaBay in SG&A spending, with a staggering 1,175% increase from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, CymaBay's expenses grew by approximately 535% during the same period. Notably, 2023 marked a significant spike for both companies, with CymaBay's expenses reaching 52 million and Rhythm's soaring to 118 million. This trend highlights the aggressive expansion and operational scaling within the biotech sector. As these companies continue to innovate, understanding their financial strategies offers valuable insights into their market positioning and future growth potential.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025