__timestamp | Apple Inc. | Zebra Technologies Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 351518000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 763025000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 751000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 749000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 811000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 826000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 787000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 935000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 982000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 915000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 | 981000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial dynamics of industry leaders is crucial. This chart offers a fascinating glimpse into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent companies: Apple Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation, from 2014 to 2023.
Apple Inc., a titan in consumer electronics, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by over 117% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its expansive global operations and marketing prowess. In contrast, Zebra Technologies, a leader in enterprise asset intelligence, has maintained a more modest increase of approximately 160% in the same period, highlighting its strategic focus on efficiency and innovation.
Interestingly, the data for 2024 is incomplete for Zebra Technologies, suggesting a potential shift or anomaly in their financial reporting. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies these companies employ to navigate the competitive tech industry.
Revenue Insights: Apple Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation Performance Compared
Apple Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Apple Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Apple Inc. vs ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.: SG&A Expense Trends
R&D Insights: How Apple Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation Allocate Funds
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Apple Inc. and Leidos Holdings, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Apple Inc. and Pure Storage, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Comprehensive EBITDA Comparison: Apple Inc. vs Zebra Technologies Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs CyberArk Software Ltd.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Apple Inc. vs Trimble Inc.