Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Teradyne, Inc.

Apple vs. Teradyne: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampApple Inc.Teradyne, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411993000000319713000
Thursday, January 1, 201514329000000306313000
Friday, January 1, 201614194000000315682000
Sunday, January 1, 201715261000000348287000
Monday, January 1, 201816705000000390669000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918245000000437083000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019916000000464769000
Friday, January 1, 202121973000000547559000
Saturday, January 1, 202225094000000558103000
Sunday, January 1, 202324932000000571426000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Apple Inc. has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 117%, reflecting its expansive global operations and marketing efforts. In contrast, Teradyne, Inc. has managed a more modest increase of around 79% in the same period, indicating a more conservative approach.

Apple's SG&A expenses peaked in 2024, while Teradyne's data for that year remains unavailable, leaving room for speculation. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies employed by tech giants in optimizing operational costs. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern market, understanding these strategies offers valuable insights into corporate efficiency and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025