SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited

SG&A Efficiency: ACADIA vs. HUTCHMED

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20143274800026684000
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400029829000
Friday, January 1, 201618645600039578000
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200043277000
Monday, January 1, 201826575800048645000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800052934000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100061349000
Friday, January 1, 2021396028000127125000
Saturday, January 1, 2022369090000136106000
Sunday, January 1, 2023402466000133175999
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Over the past decade, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A efficiency.

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

From 2014 to 2023, ACADIA's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,100%, peaking in 2023. This growth reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. However, such a rise also poses questions about cost management and profitability.

HUTCHMED (China) Limited

Conversely, HUTCHMED's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 400% during the same period. While their growth is significant, it remains more controlled compared to ACADIA, suggesting a more conservative approach to administrative spending.

These trends highlight the strategic differences between the two companies, offering insights into their operational priorities and financial strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025