SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

Apple vs. Cadence: SG&A Efficiency Unveiled

__timestampApple Inc.Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411993000000513307000
Thursday, January 1, 201514329000000512414000
Friday, January 1, 201614194000000520300000
Sunday, January 1, 201715261000000553342000
Monday, January 1, 201816705000000573075000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918245000000621479000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019916000000670885000
Friday, January 1, 202121973000000749280000
Saturday, January 1, 202225094000000846340000
Sunday, January 1, 202324932000000920649000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000001039766000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding a company's operational efficiency is crucial. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Apple's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 117%, reflecting its expansive growth and market dominance. In contrast, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. saw a more modest increase of around 79% in the same period, highlighting its steady yet impactful presence in the industry.

Apple's SG&A expenses peaked in 2024, reaching over $26 billion, while Cadence's data for 2024 remains unavailable. This comparison underscores the diverse strategies these companies employ to manage operational costs while driving innovation. As we look to the future, these insights offer a glimpse into how tech giants balance growth with efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025