SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing AstraZeneca PLC and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: AstraZeneca vs. ACADIA's Strategic Approaches

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.AstraZeneca PLC
Wednesday, January 1, 20143274800013324000000
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400011451000000
Friday, January 1, 20161864560009739000000
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200010543000000
Monday, January 1, 201826575800010362000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800011848000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100011693000000
Friday, January 1, 202139602800015680000000
Saturday, January 1, 202236909000018955000000
Sunday, January 1, 202340246600018025000000
Monday, January 1, 202420532000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, AstraZeneca PLC and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, AstraZeneca's SG&A expenses have consistently dwarfed those of ACADIA, averaging around $13 billion annually, compared to ACADIA's $271 million. However, the growth trajectory tells a different story. ACADIA's SG&A expenses surged by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, AstraZeneca's expenses grew by a modest 35%, indicating a more stable and mature market presence. This analysis highlights the diverse approaches companies take in managing operational costs, with each strategy tailored to their unique market positions and growth ambitions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025