Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Dynavax Technologies Corporation

AstraZeneca vs. Dynavax: SG&A Cost Strategies Compared

__timestampAstraZeneca PLCDynavax Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141332400000017763000
Thursday, January 1, 20151145100000022180000
Friday, January 1, 2016973900000037257000
Sunday, January 1, 20171054300000027367000
Monday, January 1, 20181036200000064770000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191184800000074986000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201169300000079256000
Friday, January 1, 202115680000000100156000
Saturday, January 1, 202218955000000131408000
Sunday, January 1, 202318025000000152946000
Monday, January 1, 202420532000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A: AstraZeneca vs. Dynavax

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, AstraZeneca PLC and Dynavax Technologies Corporation have shown contrasting approaches. AstraZeneca, a global leader, has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $18 billion in 2022. This reflects its expansive operations and robust marketing strategies. In contrast, Dynavax, a smaller biotech firm, has kept its SG&A costs significantly lower, with a peak of around $153 million in 2023. This lean approach highlights its focus on innovation and niche markets. Despite the vast difference in scale, both companies have optimized their SG&A relative to their operational models. AstraZeneca's expenses have grown by about 35% since 2014, while Dynavax's have surged by over 760%, indicating aggressive expansion. This data underscores the diverse strategies in managing operational costs within the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025