__timestamp | AstraZeneca PLC | Dynavax Technologies Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 13324000000 | 17763000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 11451000000 | 22180000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 9739000000 | 37257000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 10543000000 | 27367000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 10362000000 | 64770000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 11848000000 | 74986000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 11693000000 | 79256000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 15680000000 | 100156000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 18955000000 | 131408000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 18025000000 | 152946000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 20532000000 |
Data in motion
In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, AstraZeneca PLC and Dynavax Technologies Corporation have shown contrasting approaches. AstraZeneca, a global leader, has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $18 billion in 2022. This reflects its expansive operations and robust marketing strategies. In contrast, Dynavax, a smaller biotech firm, has kept its SG&A costs significantly lower, with a peak of around $153 million in 2023. This lean approach highlights its focus on innovation and niche markets. Despite the vast difference in scale, both companies have optimized their SG&A relative to their operational models. AstraZeneca's expenses have grown by about 35% since 2014, while Dynavax's have surged by over 760%, indicating aggressive expansion. This data underscores the diverse strategies in managing operational costs within the pharmaceutical industry.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca PLC
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of AstraZeneca PLC and United Therapeutics Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? AstraZeneca PLC or Insmed Incorporated
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing AstraZeneca PLC and Pharming Group N.V.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of AstraZeneca PLC and Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing AstraZeneca PLC and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Novartis AG and Dynavax Technologies Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Insmed Incorporated vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
MannKind Corporation and Dynavax Technologies Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Dynavax Technologies Corporation and Novavax, Inc.