SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Trends: Ionis vs. CymaBay

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014818500020140000
Thursday, January 1, 2015887100037173000
Friday, January 1, 2016964500048616000
Sunday, January 1, 201712387000108488000
Monday, January 1, 201814381000244622000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919238000287000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202017425000354000000
Friday, January 1, 202123040000186000000
Saturday, January 1, 202225116000151000000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000232600000
Monday, January 1, 2024267474000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for sustaining growth and innovation. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. over the past decade.

Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Ionis Pharmaceuticals has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2020 with a 1,658% rise from 2014. This trend reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in research and development. However, a notable decrease in 2021 and 2022 suggests a strategic shift towards cost optimization.

CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.

Conversely, CymaBay Therapeutics experienced a more modest increase, with a 535% rise in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2023. The sharp spike in 2023 indicates a potential pivot in their business strategy, possibly towards scaling operations or entering new markets.

This comparative analysis highlights the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and industry stakeholders.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025