SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Johnson & Johnson and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Johnson & Johnson vs. Rhythm Pharmaceuticals

__timestampJohnson & JohnsonRhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014219540000001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015212030000003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016199450000006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017214200000009518000
Monday, January 1, 20182254000000028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192217800000036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202208400000046125000
Friday, January 1, 20212011800000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 20221904600000092032000
Sunday, January 1, 202320112000000117532000
Monday, January 1, 202421969000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and operational efficiency. This analysis compares the SG&A efficiency of two industry players: Johnson & Johnson and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Johnson & Johnson: A Steady Giant

Johnson & Johnson, a stalwart in the pharmaceutical industry, consistently managed its SG&A expenses, averaging around $21 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, their expenses remained relatively stable, showcasing their ability to maintain operational efficiency over the years.

Rhythm Pharmaceuticals: A Growing Contender

In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a smaller player, saw a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, from just over $1 million in 2014 to approximately $118 million in 2023. This growth reflects their expanding operations and market presence.

This comparison highlights the diverse strategies and growth trajectories within the pharmaceutical sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025