SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Merck & Co., Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Merck vs. BioCryst Over a Decade

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014746100011606000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151304700010313000000
Friday, January 1, 2016112530009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017139330009830000000
Monday, January 1, 20182951400010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193712100010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020679290008955000000
Friday, January 1, 20211188180009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 202215937100010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 202321389400010504000000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.

Merck & Co., Inc.

Merck, a global leader, has consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately $11 billion in 2014. Despite fluctuations, their expenses have remained relatively stable, reflecting a strategic investment in marketing and administration to support their expansive operations.

BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In contrast, BioCryst, a smaller player, has seen a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 2700% from 2014 to 2023. This surge indicates aggressive expansion efforts and increased market penetration.

These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies to balance growth and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025