__timestamp | Pfizer Inc. | Summit Therapeutics Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 14097000000 | 6795238 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14809000000 | 7454247 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14837000000 | 10345862 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 14784000000 | 16984203 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 14455000000 | 16187290 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 14350000000 | 9299233.54 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 11615000000 | 19232000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12703000000 | 23611000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 13677000000 | 26700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 14771000000 | 28215000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 14730000000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc. have showcased contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency.
From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, averaging around $14 billion annually. This consistency reflects Pfizer's robust operational strategies, allowing it to maintain a competitive edge in the global market.
In contrast, Summit Therapeutics has seen a more dynamic trend, with SG&A expenses growing from approximately $6.8 million in 2014 to $28 million in 2023. This growth, a staggering 312% increase, highlights Summit's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.
Both companies illustrate different paths to managing SG&A expenses, offering valuable insights into strategic financial management in the pharmaceutical industry.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing AbbVie Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Pfizer Inc. vs GSK plc
Comparing Innovation Spending: Pfizer Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Pfizer Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pfizer Inc. or Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Pfizer Inc. vs Dynavax Technologies Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: United Therapeutics Corporation vs Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc. vs Summit Therapeutics Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Summit Therapeutics Inc. vs Merus N.V. Trends and Insights
Summit Therapeutics Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared