SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Pfizer Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc.

SG&A Efficiency: Pfizer vs. Summit Therapeutics

__timestampPfizer Inc.Summit Therapeutics Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014140970000006795238
Thursday, January 1, 2015148090000007454247
Friday, January 1, 20161483700000010345862
Sunday, January 1, 20171478400000016984203
Monday, January 1, 20181445500000016187290
Tuesday, January 1, 2019143500000009299233.54
Wednesday, January 1, 20201161500000019232000
Friday, January 1, 20211270300000023611000
Saturday, January 1, 20221367700000026700000
Sunday, January 1, 20231477100000028215000
Monday, January 1, 202414730000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and Summit Therapeutics Inc. have showcased contrasting approaches to SG&A efficiency.

Pfizer Inc.: A Steady Giant

From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, averaging around $14 billion annually. This consistency reflects Pfizer's robust operational strategies, allowing it to maintain a competitive edge in the global market.

Summit Therapeutics Inc.: A Dynamic Challenger

In contrast, Summit Therapeutics has seen a more dynamic trend, with SG&A expenses growing from approximately $6.8 million in 2014 to $28 million in 2023. This growth, a staggering 312% increase, highlights Summit's aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities.

Both companies illustrate different paths to managing SG&A expenses, offering valuable insights into strategic financial management in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025