United Therapeutics Corporation or ImmunityBio, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: United Therapeutics vs. ImmunityBio

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.United Therapeutics Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20144326000381287000
Thursday, January 1, 2015226206000452612000
Friday, January 1, 201694391000316800000
Sunday, January 1, 201753821000330100000
Monday, January 1, 201835463000265800000
Tuesday, January 1, 201946456000336200000
Wednesday, January 1, 202071318000423900000
Friday, January 1, 2021135256000467000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022102708000487000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023129620000477100000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: United Therapeutics or ImmunityBio?

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2023, United Therapeutics Corporation consistently outperformed ImmunityBio, Inc. in controlling these costs. United Therapeutics maintained an average SG&A expense of approximately $394 million annually, while ImmunityBio's average was around $90 million. Notably, United Therapeutics' SG&A expenses peaked in 2022 at $487 million, a 30% increase from 2014, reflecting strategic investments in growth. In contrast, ImmunityBio's expenses fluctuated more dramatically, with a significant spike in 2015, reaching $226 million, before stabilizing. This data suggests that United Therapeutics has a more consistent approach to managing operational costs, potentially providing a competitive edge. Investors and stakeholders should consider these trends when evaluating the financial health and strategic direction of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025