Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Intel Corporation

Apple vs. Intel: SG&A Cost Strategies Unveiled

__timestampApple Inc.Intel Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014119930000008136000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015143290000007930000000
Friday, January 1, 2016141940000008397000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017152610000007474000000
Monday, January 1, 2018167050000006750000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019182450000006150000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000006180000000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000006543000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000007002000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000005634000000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000005507000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the ever-evolving tech landscape, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage. From 2014 to 2023, Apple Inc. and Intel Corporation have showcased distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. Apple, with its innovative product line and global reach, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 117%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and marketing strategies. In contrast, Intel's SG&A expenses have decreased by about 31%, indicating a more conservative approach, possibly focusing on operational efficiency and cost-cutting measures.

Apple's peak in 2024, with expenses reaching over 2.6 times its 2014 figures, contrasts sharply with Intel's 2023 dip, marking a strategic divergence. This data highlights the different paths these tech titans have taken in navigating the complexities of the global market. As we look to the future, the question remains: which strategy will prove more sustainable?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025