Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Lam Research Corporation

Apple vs. Lam: Who Masters SG&A Cost Efficiency?

__timestampApple Inc.Lam Research Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201411993000000613341000
Thursday, January 1, 201514329000000591611000
Friday, January 1, 201614194000000630954000
Sunday, January 1, 201715261000000667485000
Monday, January 1, 201816705000000762219000
Tuesday, January 1, 201918245000000702407000
Wednesday, January 1, 202019916000000682479000
Friday, January 1, 202121973000000829875000
Saturday, January 1, 202225094000000885737000
Sunday, January 1, 202324932000000832753000
Monday, January 1, 202426097000000868247000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares Apple Inc. and Lam Research Corporation from 2014 to 2024, revealing intriguing insights into their cost optimization strategies.

Apple Inc., a titan in consumer electronics, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 117% over the decade, peaking in 2024. Despite this increase, Apple's revenue growth has outpaced its SG&A expenses, showcasing efficient cost management.

Conversely, Lam Research Corporation, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, has maintained a more stable SG&A expense trajectory, with a modest 42% increase over the same period. This stability reflects Lam's disciplined approach to cost control, crucial in the capital-intensive semiconductor industry.

Both companies demonstrate unique strategies in optimizing SG&A costs, highlighting the diverse approaches within the tech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025