__timestamp | Apple Inc. | Lam Research Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 11993000000 | 613341000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 14329000000 | 591611000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 14194000000 | 630954000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 15261000000 | 667485000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 16705000000 | 762219000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18245000000 | 702407000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 19916000000 | 682479000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 21973000000 | 829875000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25094000000 | 885737000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 24932000000 | 832753000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 26097000000 | 868247000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the competitive world of technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. This analysis compares Apple Inc. and Lam Research Corporation from 2014 to 2024, revealing intriguing insights into their cost optimization strategies.
Apple Inc., a titan in consumer electronics, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 117% over the decade, peaking in 2024. Despite this increase, Apple's revenue growth has outpaced its SG&A expenses, showcasing efficient cost management.
Conversely, Lam Research Corporation, a leader in semiconductor manufacturing, has maintained a more stable SG&A expense trajectory, with a modest 42% increase over the same period. This stability reflects Lam's disciplined approach to cost control, crucial in the capital-intensive semiconductor industry.
Both companies demonstrate unique strategies in optimizing SG&A costs, highlighting the diverse approaches within the tech sector.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Apple Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Apple Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Apple Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation
Apple Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Fiserv, Inc. Trends and Insights
Apple Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Apple Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Fiserv, Inc.
Apple Inc. or Applied Materials, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Shopify Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Apple Inc. vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Apple Inc. Against Lam Research Corporation