Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Apple Inc. or Jabil Inc.

Apple vs. Jabil: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampApple Inc.Jabil Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411993000000675730000
Thursday, January 1, 201514329000000862647000
Friday, January 1, 201614194000000924427000
Sunday, January 1, 201715261000000907702000
Monday, January 1, 2018167050000001050716000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019182450000001111347000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000001174694000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000001213000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000001154000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000001206000000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000001160000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive world of technology and manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and Jabil Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Apple Inc. has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 117%, reflecting its expansive growth and investment in innovation. In contrast, Jabil Inc. has maintained a more stable SG&A trajectory, with only a 72% increase over the same period.

Apple's SG&A expenses peaked in 2024, reaching nearly 2.6 times its 2014 levels, while Jabil's expenses showed a more modest rise, indicating a disciplined approach to cost management. This comparison highlights the different paths these companies have taken in balancing growth with operational efficiency. As investors and analysts look to the future, understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025