__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Fiserv, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 975000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 1034000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 1101000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 1150000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 1228000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 3284000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 5652000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 5810000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 6059000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 6576000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 6564000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the competitive landscape of technology and financial services, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Fiserv, Inc. have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials maintained a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.8 billion in 2023, reflecting a 100% rise from 2014. This growth aligns with their expanding market presence and innovation investments. Conversely, Fiserv's SG&A expenses surged dramatically, especially post-2018, reaching over 6.5 billion by 2023, a staggering 570% increase from 2014. This spike highlights their aggressive acquisition strategy and integration costs. While Applied Materials exhibits a more controlled expense trajectory, Fiserv's approach underscores a bold expansion strategy. Missing data for 2024 suggests ongoing adjustments. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into corporate financial strategies.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fiserv, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fiserv, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Fiserv, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Sony Group Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Arista Networks, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Shopify Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Applied Materials, Inc. Against Fiserv, Inc.
Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.