__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Micron Technology, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 707000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 719000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 659000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 743000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 813000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 836000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 881000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 894000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 1066000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 920000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 1129000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of the semiconductor industry, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. have demonstrated distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses over the past decade. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials has seen a steady increase in SG&A spending, growing by approximately 102% from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Micron Technology's SG&A expenses have increased by about 60% over the same period. Notably, in 2023, Applied Materials' SG&A expenses were nearly 77% higher than Micron's, highlighting their aggressive investment in administrative capabilities. This divergence in spending patterns reflects differing strategic priorities, with Applied Materials potentially focusing more on scaling operations and market expansion. As the semiconductor industry continues to grow, these financial strategies will play a pivotal role in shaping the competitive landscape.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Micron Technology, Inc.: Examining Key Revenue Metrics
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Applied Materials, Inc. and Shopify Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or Fiserv, Inc.
Comparing Innovation Spending: Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or KLA Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation