ASML Holding N.V. or STMicroelectronics N.V.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

ASML vs. STM: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampASML Holding N.V.STMicroelectronics N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000940000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000891000000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000933000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174166000001001000000
Monday, January 1, 20184880000001109000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20195205000001093000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205449000001123000000
Friday, January 1, 20217256000001319000000
Saturday, January 1, 20229096000001428000000
Sunday, January 1, 202311132000001650000000
Monday, January 1, 20241165700000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: ASML vs. STMicroelectronics

In the competitive landscape of semiconductor giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. From 2014 to 2023, ASML Holding N.V. and STMicroelectronics N.V. have shown distinct strategies in handling these costs. ASML's SG&A expenses have grown steadily, starting at approximately 32% of STMicroelectronics' costs in 2014 and reaching 67% by 2023. This indicates a more controlled increase compared to STMicroelectronics, whose expenses have surged by 75% over the same period.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

ASML's approach reflects a strategic balance between growth and cost management, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 15% in SG&A expenses. In contrast, STMicroelectronics has experienced a CAGR of about 6%, suggesting a more aggressive expansion strategy. This data highlights the importance of efficient cost management in sustaining competitive advantage in the semiconductor industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025