Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Mesoblast Limited

Gilead vs. Mesoblast: A Decade of SG&A Cost Strategies

__timestampGilead Sciences, Inc.Mesoblast Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014298300000054170000
Thursday, January 1, 2015342600000065378000
Friday, January 1, 2016339800000052263000
Sunday, January 1, 2017387800000035072000
Monday, January 1, 2018405600000027415000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019438100000036983000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020515100000050918000
Friday, January 1, 2021524600000063586000
Saturday, January 1, 2022567300000057967000
Sunday, January 1, 2023609000000053107000
Monday, January 1, 2024609100000023626000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Mesoblast Limited, two prominent players, have shown contrasting approaches over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead's SG&A expenses have surged by over 100%, peaking at approximately $6 billion in 2023. This reflects a strategic investment in administrative capabilities and market expansion. In contrast, Mesoblast has maintained a more conservative approach, with expenses fluctuating around $50 million, indicating a focus on lean operations. Interestingly, both companies have shown a similar downward trend in SG&A expenses, suggesting a shared industry-wide shift towards cost optimization. As we look to the future, the absence of data for Gilead in 2024 raises questions about their strategic direction. Will they continue to expand, or will they adopt a more frugal approach like Mesoblast?

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025