Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Merus N.V.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Strategies: Madrigal vs. Merus

__timestampMadrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Merus N.V.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014157460003852327
Thursday, January 1, 201513392000839656
Friday, January 1, 201692900004478145
Sunday, January 1, 2017767200016432324
Monday, January 1, 20181529300011890871
Tuesday, January 1, 20192264800034110000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202186400035781000
Friday, January 1, 20213731800040896000
Saturday, January 1, 20224813000052200000
Sunday, January 1, 202310814600059836000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for financial health. Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Merus N.V., two prominent players, have shown distinct strategies over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Madrigal's SG&A expenses surged by over 580%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Merus N.V. exhibited a steadier growth, with a 1,450% increase from 2015 to 2023. This divergence highlights Madrigal's aggressive expansion strategy, while Merus focuses on sustainable growth. Notably, in 2023, Madrigal's expenses were nearly double those of Merus, indicating a potential shift in operational focus. As these companies navigate the biotech landscape, their SG&A strategies will be pivotal in determining their market positions. Investors and industry watchers should keep a keen eye on how these expenses evolve, as they are a barometer of strategic priorities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025