Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Sanofi or ImmunityBio, Inc.

Sanofi vs. ImmunityBio: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampImmunityBio, Inc.Sanofi
Wednesday, January 1, 201443260008565000000
Thursday, January 1, 20152262060009496000000
Friday, January 1, 2016943910009592000000
Sunday, January 1, 20175382100010164000000
Monday, January 1, 2018354630009934000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019464560009883000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020713180009390000000
Friday, January 1, 20211352560009555000000
Saturday, January 1, 202210270800010539000000
Sunday, January 1, 202312962000010765000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Sanofi and ImmunityBio, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. Sanofi, a global leader, consistently maintained high SG&A expenses, averaging around $9.8 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. This reflects their expansive global operations and robust marketing strategies. In contrast, ImmunityBio, Inc., a smaller biotech firm, averaged approximately $90 million in the same period, showcasing a leaner approach. Notably, ImmunityBio's SG&A expenses surged by over 2,900% from 2014 to 2023, indicating rapid growth and increased investment in administrative capabilities. Meanwhile, Sanofi's expenses grew by about 26%, reflecting steady expansion. This comparison highlights the diverse strategies in cost management between established giants and emerging innovators in the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025