Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? United Therapeutics Corporation or Grifols, S.A.

SG&A Cost Strategies: Grifols vs. United Therapeutics

__timestampGrifols, S.A.United Therapeutics Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014660772000381287000
Thursday, January 1, 2015736435000452612000
Friday, January 1, 2016775266000316800000
Sunday, January 1, 2017860348000330100000
Monday, January 1, 2018814775000265800000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019942821000336200000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020985616000423900000
Friday, January 1, 20211061508000467000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221190423000487000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231254234000477100000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, United Therapeutics Corporation and Grifols, S.A. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in this area.

From 2014 to 2023, Grifols, S.A. saw a steady increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 90%, reflecting their aggressive expansion and marketing strategies. In contrast, United Therapeutics Corporation maintained a more conservative approach, with their SG&A expenses increasing by about 25% over the same period.

This divergence highlights different corporate strategies: Grifols' focus on growth and market penetration versus United Therapeutics' emphasis on cost efficiency. As investors and analysts evaluate these companies, understanding their SG&A optimization strategies provides valuable insights into their operational priorities and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025