Apple Inc. or QUALCOMM Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Apple vs. Qualcomm: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampApple Inc.QUALCOMM Incorporated
Wednesday, January 1, 2014119930000002290000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015143290000002344000000
Friday, January 1, 2016141940000002385000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017152610000002658000000
Monday, January 1, 2018167050000002986000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019182450000002195000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020199160000002074000000
Friday, January 1, 2021219730000002339000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022250940000002570000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023249320000002483000000
Monday, January 1, 2024260970000002759000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Apple vs. Qualcomm: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the ever-evolving tech industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Apple Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated have demonstrated contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Apple's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 117%, reflecting its expansive growth and investment in global operations. In contrast, Qualcomm's expenses have increased by about 20%, showcasing a more conservative fiscal strategy.

Apple's SG&A costs peaked in 2024, reaching nearly 26 billion, while Qualcomm's expenses remained relatively stable, peaking at around 2.8 billion in the same year. This disparity highlights Apple's aggressive market expansion compared to Qualcomm's steady approach. As these tech giants continue to innovate, their financial strategies offer valuable insights into their operational priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025