__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | KLA Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 384907000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 406864000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 379399000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 389336000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 443426000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 599124000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 734149000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 729602000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 860007000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 986326000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 969509000 |
Unlocking the unknown
In the competitive landscape of semiconductor manufacturing, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and KLA Corporation have demonstrated distinct strategies in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2024, Applied Materials has seen a steady increase in SG&A expenses, peaking at approximately 1.8 billion in 2024, reflecting a growth of nearly 100% from 2014. In contrast, KLA Corporation's SG&A expenses have grown at a slower pace, reaching around 970 million in 2024, marking a 150% increase from 2014. This divergence highlights Applied Materials' aggressive expansion strategy, while KLA Corporation focuses on cost efficiency. As the industry evolves, these strategies will play a pivotal role in shaping their competitive edge.
Understanding SG&A trends can reveal strategic priorities and operational efficiencies in the semiconductor industry.
Who Generates More Revenue? Applied Materials, Inc. or KLA Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs KLA Corporation
Who Generates Higher Gross Profit? Applied Materials, Inc. or KLA Corporation
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation Trends and Insights
R&D Insights: How Applied Materials, Inc. and KLA Corporation Allocate Funds
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. and Infosys Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or MicroStrategy Incorporated
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. Compared to KLA Corporation