__timestamp | Amphenol Corporation | Applied Materials, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 645100000 | 890000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 669100000 | 897000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 798200000 | 819000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 878300000 | 890000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 959500000 | 1002000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 971400000 | 982000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1014200000 | 1093000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1226300000 | 1229000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1420900000 | 1438000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1489900000 | 1628000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1855400000 | 1797000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology and electronics, effective cost management is crucial. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation have demonstrated distinct strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, both companies have seen a steady increase in these costs, reflecting their growth and expansion efforts.
In 2014, Amphenol's SG&A expenses were approximately 645 million, while Applied Materials started at around 890 million. Fast forward to 2024, and these figures have surged by nearly 188% and 102%, respectively. This growth underscores the companies' commitment to scaling operations and enhancing market presence.
While both companies have increased their SG&A expenses, Applied Materials has consistently maintained a higher expenditure, peaking at 1.8 billion in 2024. This trend suggests a more aggressive investment in administrative and sales functions, potentially driving innovation and market leadership.
Revenue Showdown: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Amphenol Corporation
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Amphenol Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or KLA Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. and Infosys Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Amphenol Corporation
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or MicroStrategy Incorporated
Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared